Alternative Linguiatics - Late Bronze and Iron Age.

Alternative Historical Linguistics

Main | Late Bronze and Iron Age. | Sign Up | Login

Welcome Guest | RSS


	Site menu
	Home page Site info Abbreviations Literature. A. Lexicography Literature. B. Scientic Works and Sources: A - G Literature. B. Scientic Works and Sources: H - M Literature. B. Scientic Works and Sources: N - S Literature. B. Scientic Works and Sources: T - Z Preamble Publisher Blog Forum Guestbook Introductory Survey Idea of the Method Main postulates The Graphic-Analytical Method Ethno-Generating Areas Settling East Europe & Asia The Relationship of the Sino-Tibetan Languages The Relationship of the Altaic and Turkic Languages The Anthropological Type of the Autochthon Europeans The North Caucasian Languages The Urheimat of the Nostratic Peoples Bronze Age The Settlement of Nostratic Tribes in Eastern Europe The Language Contacts between Indoeuropeans, Turks, and Finno-Ugrians The Areas of the Uprising of the Tocharian, Albanian, Thracian, Phrygian Languages Ethnicity of the Neolithic and Chalcolithic Cultures of Eastern Europe First Great Migration Migration Indo-European Tribes in the Light of the Phonetic Features of their Languages Iranian Tribes Germanic Tribes Archaeological Cultures Turks as carriers of the Corded Ware culture in Europe. Discussion Iron Age The Ethnogenesis of the Slavs Slavs: Territory, Dialectal Split Slavic Cultural and Language Connections The Slavic Expansion Migration Indo-European Tribes in the Light of the Phonetic Features of their Languages The Expansion of the Finno-Ugric Peoples Scytho-Sarmatian time Cimmerians. Iaranian and Slavic Cultural Contacts To the Question of Slavic-Iranian Language Connections Cimbri Scythian Culture and Language Scythian Language Scythian Mythology Interpretation of the Data of Ancient Historians Sauromatians Sarmatians Sarmatian Enigmatic Figure Alans Hypotheses emitic Tribes in Eastern Europe at Prehistoric Time Run-on Common Nostratic Heritage in Vocabulary of Turkics and Indoeuropeans Traces of Contacts of Tutks and Indoeuropeans in Vocabularies Turkic-Slavic Language Contacts Chuvash-Germanic Language Connections Prehistoric Place Names of the Eastern Europe Finno-Ugric Place Names in Central Russia Ancient Anglo-Saxon Place Names Ancient Teutonic Place Names in Volin Bulgarish Place Names Iranian Place Names in Ukraine and Poland The Hypothetic Nostratic Consonant RZ To the Primary Formation of Numerals in Nostratic Languages The Names of Metals in The Turkic and Indo-European Languages Common Turkic – Indo-European Heritage in Names of Plants To the Source of Brewing in Eastern Europe Sketch on the Development of Marchandise in Eastern Europe in Prehistoric Times Common Vocabulary of the Chuvash and Other Turkic Languages with Germanic The Substratum Pheno... Ukrainian Surnames o... Language Substratum The Development of S... Anglo-Saxons at Sour... Anglo-Saxons at Sour...


	Statistics
	Total online: 3 Guests: 3 Users: 0


	Login form


	Etymological Table Database. Indo-European, Finno-Ugric, Turkic, Germanic, Iranian Languages


	Often visited sites The Urheimat of the Nostratic Languages The Relationship of the Altaic and Turkic languages. Origin and development.


	Late Bronze and Iron Age. The using of the graphic-analytical method has caused the choice of a strong point for the research of the subsequent history of ethnogenic processes in Eastern Europe. The graphical model of the mutual relation of Slavic languages can be the such. The study of by Baltic languages cannot give results because of their small quantity. Only two of them – Latvian and Lithuanian – remained be "living" tongues at present. Yet the vocabulary of Prussian language restored by linguists can be still added to these languages, but the obtained model of these three languages cannot be localized on natural areas of their uprising because of the small quantity of knots. In any case the model will have the form of a triangle which can be placed on a geographical map in any way. Not much information was kept about the Thracian language or its dialects. The same can be said about the language of the Scythians. Consequently, we have no other material for the study concerning the 1st mill BC except the vocabulary of the Slavic languages. The first such study by means of selected vocabulary of modern Slavic tongues has been maid yet at the end of the eighties and its results has been published in a linguistic magazine (STETSYUK V.M., 1987). However the results of new research were already known yet then. This research has been made by means of the other database, namely by the representative selection from Slawski's and Trubachev's etymological dictionaries of the Proto-Slavic-language (TRUBACHIOV O.N. Ed., 1974 – ), SŁAWSKI F. 1974). Unfortunately, limited volume of the magazine article did not allow to publish the results of both researches. Consequently the results of the previous research have been chosen for the publication, although, it would be necessary to bring some correction to the model of Slavic languages concerning Russian language according the results of the second research. This was be done some years later (STETSYUK VALENTYN., 2000). The Interrelation of the Slavic languages Slavs: Territory, Dialectal Split The migration of the Indo-European Peoples at the End of the 2nd and at the Beginning of the 1st Mil The Expansion of the Finno-Ugric Peoples


	Search

Calendar


	Site friends
	Create a free website Online Desktop Free Online Games Video Tutorials All HTML Tags Browser Kits